All fairly unsurprising. The president ran with the promise of perpetual partisan warfare rather than being above it. Also makes sense that the linked page word cloud would be dominated by his name.
> So the majority are right-wing propaganda sites.
Not a single right-wing site. A bunch of pro-israel sites though. Don't think any genuinely right-wing site would be pro-israel. Just like a genuinely left wing site wouldn't be pro-israel either.
This seems like a non-genuine take. You seem to have a definition of (American) right-wing that fails to include the President’s social media site?
I’m sure you’d like to divorce ‘true’ right-wing causes from whatever is happening in the federal government these days, but a new horse is pulling your cart, and you may need to find a new party to get what you want.
> Don't think any genuinely right-wing site would be pro-israel
Except that a large faction in the overall right coalition are fundamentalist Christians who want the Third Temple built ASAP so Jesus will come back and they can get Raptured and look down on us sinners for eternity.
Now you may say "well no TRUE Scot^H^H^H^Hright-winger", but that'd be to retreat into an abstraction and ignore everyday reality.
> top 10 domains that the White House Wire links to (by occurrence), from May 8 to June 24, 2025:
jfc.Obviously nothing but the absolute best from our elected official.
All fairly unsurprising. The president ran with the promise of perpetual partisan warfare rather than being above it. Also makes sense that the linked page word cloud would be dominated by his name.
So the majority are right-wing propaganda sites. Surprising (if you've spent the past 20 years living in a cave with no wifi).
> So the majority are right-wing propaganda sites.
Not a single right-wing site. A bunch of pro-israel sites though. Don't think any genuinely right-wing site would be pro-israel. Just like a genuinely left wing site wouldn't be pro-israel either.
> Not a single right-wing site.
This cannot be a serious, good faith comment. How would you classify, say breitbart.com, then?
This seems like a non-genuine take. You seem to have a definition of (American) right-wing that fails to include the President’s social media site?
I’m sure you’d like to divorce ‘true’ right-wing causes from whatever is happening in the federal government these days, but a new horse is pulling your cart, and you may need to find a new party to get what you want.
> Don't think any genuinely right-wing site would be pro-israel
Except that a large faction in the overall right coalition are fundamentalist Christians who want the Third Temple built ASAP so Jesus will come back and they can get Raptured and look down on us sinners for eternity.
Now you may say "well no TRUE Scot^H^H^H^Hright-winger", but that'd be to retreat into an abstraction and ignore everyday reality.